Post by Admin/ Traveler on Sept 23, 2017 16:10:42 GMT
First, “Lyme Borreliosis” was a Relapsing Fever organism like all other spirochetes known for over 100 years to be a permanent brain infection. Then it changed to “Lyme disease” and was only an HLA-linked hypersensitivity response with really the only symptom being an arthritic knee. Look at this graphic and notice the difference in the blots. The arthritis cases are all blacked out and thats because they produce a lot of antibodies. The neurologic outcome is much more severe because antibody production is so low, they get immunosuppression instead. The cryme is that patent owners changed the case definition to say that ONLY the arthritis outcome was “Lyme disease”. Anyone that doesn’t produce antibodies doesn’t have a valid disease, they are just psychiatric and are thrown out like trash.
We victims don’t really care what anyone calls this, we just want help as we are suffering with several neurologic diseases at the same time. Suffice it to say that calling it “Chronic Lyme” leaves a bad taste in my mouth the more I learn about the cryme. It has lost it’s meaning. This disease is so much more than just a chronic bacterial infection as implied by the term “Chronic Lyme”. The old paradigm is the one we are trying to bring back. Everything before about 1990 is pretty accurate when it comes to this disease, anything after 1990 is based on scientific fraud.
Pre-Dearborn
1990 Diagnostic Criteria for Lyme borreliosis was fine, there was no reason to change it. This criteria was based on the 1986 report from Allen Steere where he says that bands fluctuate over time but all you really need is band 41 to make the diagnosis, just rule out syphilis: Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. Appearance of a new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G response late in the illness.
Post Dearborn-
After 1994 Dearborn all the sudden to have a “case” of Lyme disease you needed a lot more antibodies present and all at the same time. This criteria is based on Allen Steeres scientific fraud committed in Europe where he illegally used high-passage strains and added the ELISA as a screening test resulting in all of the chronic neurologic cases being ruled out in the first step:
link to "charge sheets"
Mark Klempner
Then there is Mark Klempner who with his famous “re-treatment” study decided that tick bite sepsis victims were psychiatric, when before he reported that due to intracellular spirochetes ceftriaxone couldn’t even clear the infection. Another thing to note is that ceftriaxone is used for meningitis as it acts in the central nervous system, not knees.
His fake re-treatment study costed us $4.7 million dollars. That’s a lotta dough wasted just so he could publish more fraud. Good thing we have such an awesome whistleblower on our side helping us pull the nails out of our collective coffin one by one.
Here, in 1992, is the first report from Klempner saying that you can’t kill spirochetes:
Here is the second from Klempner areporting brain and nerve degrading enzymes being found in CSF of tick bite sepsis victims, so not a knee and not psychiatric:
In this video recorded in 2001 he clearly states that: “It turns out that if you look at the first 51 patients with post-treatment chronic Lyme disease, the patient population that participated in our study, there was a very high incidence of DQB0602 with an odds ratio of 770%. So it may well be that exposure to THAT organism with THAT background of HLA haplotype may lead you to develop chronic symptoms. “ link to video
Go here to read more of this important information: Lyme Cryme 180’s
We victims don’t really care what anyone calls this, we just want help as we are suffering with several neurologic diseases at the same time. Suffice it to say that calling it “Chronic Lyme” leaves a bad taste in my mouth the more I learn about the cryme. It has lost it’s meaning. This disease is so much more than just a chronic bacterial infection as implied by the term “Chronic Lyme”. The old paradigm is the one we are trying to bring back. Everything before about 1990 is pretty accurate when it comes to this disease, anything after 1990 is based on scientific fraud.
Pre-Dearborn
1990 Diagnostic Criteria for Lyme borreliosis was fine, there was no reason to change it. This criteria was based on the 1986 report from Allen Steere where he says that bands fluctuate over time but all you really need is band 41 to make the diagnosis, just rule out syphilis: Antigens of Borrelia burgdorferi recognized during Lyme disease. Appearance of a new immunoglobulin M response and expansion of the immunoglobulin G response late in the illness.
Post Dearborn-
After 1994 Dearborn all the sudden to have a “case” of Lyme disease you needed a lot more antibodies present and all at the same time. This criteria is based on Allen Steeres scientific fraud committed in Europe where he illegally used high-passage strains and added the ELISA as a screening test resulting in all of the chronic neurologic cases being ruled out in the first step:
link to "charge sheets"
Mark Klempner
Then there is Mark Klempner who with his famous “re-treatment” study decided that tick bite sepsis victims were psychiatric, when before he reported that due to intracellular spirochetes ceftriaxone couldn’t even clear the infection. Another thing to note is that ceftriaxone is used for meningitis as it acts in the central nervous system, not knees.
His fake re-treatment study costed us $4.7 million dollars. That’s a lotta dough wasted just so he could publish more fraud. Good thing we have such an awesome whistleblower on our side helping us pull the nails out of our collective coffin one by one.
Here, in 1992, is the first report from Klempner saying that you can’t kill spirochetes:
Here is the second from Klempner areporting brain and nerve degrading enzymes being found in CSF of tick bite sepsis victims, so not a knee and not psychiatric:
In this video recorded in 2001 he clearly states that: “It turns out that if you look at the first 51 patients with post-treatment chronic Lyme disease, the patient population that participated in our study, there was a very high incidence of DQB0602 with an odds ratio of 770%. So it may well be that exposure to THAT organism with THAT background of HLA haplotype may lead you to develop chronic symptoms. “ link to video
Go here to read more of this important information: Lyme Cryme 180’s